Hyper3D AI is a cutting-edge platform powered by the Rodin AI model that transforms text prompts or 2D images into production-ready 3D assets. It generates clean quad meshes, PBR textures up to 4K, and supports exports like GLB, OBJ, FBX for game engines such as Unity and Blender. Ideal for game developers, AR/VR creators, and designers, it automates retopology, texturing, and rendering to streamline workflows.
Is Hyper3D AI Free or Paid?
Hyper3D AI follows a freemium model with a limited free tier offering basic access and trial credits, plus a 7-day full-feature trial. Paid subscriptions and credit purchases are required for unlimited generations, high-quality exports, API access, and advanced tools like multi-view inputs.
Hyper3D AI Pricing Details
Hyper3D AI uses credit-based subscriptions with plans tailored for individuals, teams, and enterprises. A 7-day Creator trial provides full access upon signup.
| Plan Name | Price (Monthly / Yearly) | Main Features | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 / $0 | Limited credits, basic generations with watermarks, low-res previews | Hobbyists testing image/text-to-3D |
| Creator | $30 / $300 (est.) | 500+ credits/mo, full PBR textures, clean meshes, standard exports (GLB/OBJ/FBX) | Individual creators, game devs prototyping assets |
| Business | $120 / $1,200 (est.) | 2,000+ credits/mo, API access, team collaboration, priority processing | Studios, AR/VR teams needing bulk production |
| Education | $12 / $120 (est.) | Discounted Creator features, student verification required | Students, educators for learning 3D workflows |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited credits, custom models, on-prem API, mass generation | Large orgs with high-volume 3D needs |
Also Read-Deevid AI Free, Alternative, Pricing, Pros and Cons
Best Alternatives to Hyper3D AI
Hyper3D AI leads in mesh quality and PBR realism, but competitors offer varying strengths in speed, cost, or multi-model access.
| Alternative Tool Name | Free or Paid | Key Feature | How it Compares to Hyper3D AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meshy AI | Both | Multi-angle image-to-3D with refinement | Faster for iterations but messier topology; cheaper credits, less photorealistic than Hyper3D’s Rodin |
| 3D AI Studio | Both | Access to multiple models (Rodin + others) | Broader model selection at lower cost; similar quality but no native sculpting like Hyper3D |
| Tripo AI | Both | Rapid text-to-3D prototypes | Quicker/cheaper for concepts; lower detail and texture fidelity vs Hyper3D’s production-ready outputs |
| Luma AI | Both | Video/NeRF-based 3D capture | Strong for real-world scans; lacks text generation depth and clean meshes of Hyper3D |
| Sloyd | Paid | Editable templates post-generation | More manual control for hard-surface models; less automated AI conversion than Hyper3D’s image/text focus |
Pros and Cons of Hyper3D AI
Pros
- Superior clean quad topology and PBR materials ready for engines like Unity/Blender without manual fixes.
- Supports both single/multi-image inputs and text prompts for versatile generation.
- Fast processing with high accuracy on hard-surface and organic models, rated top in independent tests.
- Commercial rights on all plans, plus API for workflow integration.
- Additional tools like OmniCraft for textures/HDRI enhance full asset pipelines.
Cons
- Credit system can exhaust quickly on high-res generations, making frequent use costly.
- Free tier limited to previews/watermarks, pushing upgrades for exports.
- Mixed Trustpilot reviews (2.8/5) cite occasional artifacts or support delays.
- Steeper learning for API/advanced poses; not ideal for ultra-complex scenes.
- Requires stable internet as fully cloud-based, no offline mode.