Sarvam AI is a full-stack generative AI platform designed to support India’s diverse linguistic landscape. It provides advanced tools for speech-to-text, text-to-speech, translation, vision models, and conversational agents, with a strong emphasis on Indian languages and local contexts. Built entirely in India, Sarvam AI enables developers and businesses to create scalable applications that handle multilingual tasks efficiently, from document understanding to voice-based interactions.
Is Sarvam AI Free or Paid?
SarvamAI operates on a primarily paid model with pay-per-use pricing for its APIs, ensuring flexibility for varying usage levels. However, it includes free elements like the Sarvam-M chat completion model with no usage charges, and new users receive ₹1000 in free credits to explore the platform’s capabilities without initial costs.
Sarvam AI Pricing Details
| Plan Name | Price (Monthly / Yearly) | Main Features | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | $0 / $0 | ₹1000 free credits for new users; Unlimited access to Sarvam-M chat completion model; Basic testing of APIs like speech-to-text and translation; Free Document Intelligence API (limited time offers). | Beginners and developers experimenting with Indian language AI tools. |
| Standard API | Pay-per-use (no fixed monthly; billed per request) | Speech-to-Text: ₹30/hour; Text-to-Speech (Bulbul v3 Beta): ₹30/10K characters; Translation: ₹20/10K characters; Diarization add-on: +₹15/hour; Universal credits for all services; Rounded billing per second/character. | Growing businesses needing scalable, on-demand multilingual AI integrations. |
| Enterprise | Custom (contact for quote) / Custom | Volume discounts; Custom rate limits; Dedicated support; Tailored models for specific industries; Enhanced security and sovereign deployment options; Access to all APIs with priority features. | Large organizations requiring high-volume usage, customization, and enterprise-grade reliability. |
Also Read-Kling AI: The Ultimate Guide to Kuaishou’s AI Video Generator
Best Alternatives to Sarvam AI
| Alternative Tool Name | Free or Paid | Key Feature | How it Compares to SarvamAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Krutrim AI | Paid (with free tier) | Multimodal AI with strong Indian language support | Similar focus on Indic languages and sovereign models, but Krutrim emphasizes broader generative capabilities; less specialized in vision tasks compared to Sarvam AI’s OCR strengths. |
| Mistral AI | Paid (open-source options) | Efficient large language models for text generation | Offers competitive performance in multilingual tasks, but lacks Sarvam AI’s deep integration with Indian speech and vision tools; better for global use cases with lower inference costs. |
| Gnani.ai | Paid | Voice AI for customer service in multiple Indian languages | Excels in conversational agents like Sarvam AI, with robust ASR and TTS; however, it has fewer vision features and may require more setup, while Sarvam AI provides a more comprehensive full-stack platform. |
| Yellow.ai | Paid | Dynamic AI agents for omnichannel engagement | Strong in enterprise chat and voice bots, comparable to Sarvam AI’s agents; stands out with no-code builders, but Sarvam AI edges in sovereign data control and Indic OCR accuracy. |
| Google Cloud Speech-to-Text | Paid (with free tier) | Real-time speech recognition with multilingual support | Provides global scalability and ease of use, similar to Sarvam AI’s speech APIs; but Sarvam AI outperforms in Indian-specific tasks like code-mixed languages and offers better pricing for local needs. |
Pros and Cons of Sarvam AI
Pros
- Exceptional performance in Indian languages, outperforming global models in tasks like OCR and speech recognition for Indic scripts.
- Sovereign platform ensuring data control and compliance, ideal for India-focused applications.
- Versatile full-stack tools covering text, speech, vision, and agents, enabling end-to-end solutions.
- Efficient models with low latency and token efficiency, suitable for edge deployments.
- Free credits and models like Sarvam-M make it accessible for initial testing and development.
Cons
- Pay-per-use pricing can add up for high-volume or frequent API calls, potentially increasing costs unpredictably.
- Primarily focused on Indian contexts, which may limit its effectiveness for non-Indic or global multilingual needs.
- Requires technical integration via APIs, which might be challenging for non-developers without no-code options.
- Beta features like Bulbul v3 may have higher costs and occasional inconsistencies during early stages.
- Limited free tier beyond initial credits, pushing users toward paid usage for advanced capabilities.